(1) there is no need for hysteria about caving to legal demands, there are no legal demands, just someone who feels that the article was unfair to the company, and who is working with kindness with me to try to resolve the issue in a mutually satisfactory way and (2) we have a moral obligation to be precise and neutral in all. While my edits should NOT be considered as decrees as to the details of the content, please understand a couple of things. I am in contact with one of the principals of the company, and he seems happy to work with me and through me to reach an NPOV version of the article. If you read the article very carefully, it seems that the 'deceptive advertising' settlement article on did not say 'tricking the user onto the company's website where the user can install BonziBUDDY.' The word 'tricking' here seems to me unnecessarily pejorative the description of the ads seems clear enough and is uncontroversially factual. One of the key changes was to the paragraph about these court cases. I made several changes, some quite minor, some a little more major. so that is a varitable gold mine they are all down basically but is working.

archive of original filing with Dec 4 date ( )Īlso, there is 40 articles on about it.

Ug, these have been a pain to drag down, as has the links down now.

11 Adding Bonzi Community link to extrnal links.

7 In April 2007, PCWorld readers voted Bonzi Buddy 6th on a list of 'the top 10 most annoying tech products'.

We are number one bonzi buddy